Does freedom of speech shield menacing threats? Or does the law have the right to step in when verbal threats instill fear and potential harm? We found ourselves in a labyrinth of these questions in our latest episode, guided by the landmark Supreme Court decision on Counterman versus Colorado. We unwind the intricate layers of defining a threat, especially in this digital age, where threats can be disguised behind the veil of anonymity. We weigh the subjective intent of the speaker against the objective perspective of a reasonable person and question which should hold more weight in legally certifying a threat.
Eric discusses the rights of journalists and guidelines for the current challenges of police and press relations with expert Attorney Mickey Osterreicher, general counsel...
EPISODE SUMMARY: In this episode of the Guardian Mindset Podcast, Chief Liam Duggan joins host Attorney Eric Daigle for an engaging discussion on the...
Episode Summary: Today, we welcome Dr. Katherine Kuhlman to the Guardian Mindset podcast. As a distinguished police and public safety psychologist, Dr. Kuhlman brings...