Does freedom of speech shield menacing threats? Or does the law have the right to step in when verbal threats instill fear and potential harm? We found ourselves in a labyrinth of these questions in our latest episode, guided by the landmark Supreme Court decision on Counterman versus Colorado. We unwind the intricate layers of defining a threat, especially in this digital age, where threats can be disguised behind the veil of anonymity. We weigh the subjective intent of the speaker against the objective perspective of a reasonable person and question which should hold more weight in legally certifying a threat.
In this episode of the Guardian Mindset Podcast, Attorney Eric Daigle dives deep into the critical legal issues shaping modern protest response tactics. Broadcasting...
Lieutenant Kevin Dillon (Retired) joins Eric in the studio to discuss the reporting and tracking of use of force, and where those practices need...
Episode Summary: In this captivating episode, we have the privilege of welcoming retired Chief Terri Wilfong, a trailblazing female leader in law enforcement, to...