Attorney Eric Daigle returns to the studio to discuss geolocation data, how it works, and how geofencing is used both commercially and by law enforcement. Eric reviews guiding decisions such as Katz v. United States, Kyllo v. United States, and Carpenter v. United States to highlight the implications of geofencing and geofencing warrants on the Fourth Amendment and expectation of privacy.
Attorney Daigle reviews the U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach and Nieves v. Bartlett to highlight some of the...
Continuing with the subject of technology, Attorney Eric Daigle reviews the DC Circuit Court of Appeals decision in United States v. Chauncey Jones (2021)....
In this episode, we break down several major Supreme Court cases headed into 2026 that could reshape law enforcement practices and Second Amendment enforcement,...
