Attorney Eric Daigle returns to the studio to discuss geolocation data, how it works, and how geofencing is used both commercially and by law enforcement. Eric reviews guiding decisions such as Katz v. United States, Kyllo v. United States, and Carpenter v. United States to highlight the implications of geofencing and geofencing warrants on the Fourth Amendment and expectation of privacy.
The Supreme Court continues to reshape the constitutional boundaries of firearm ownership, public carry, and government regulation. What do these decisions mean for law...
Show Notes: In this episode of the Guardian Mindset Podcast, Attorney Eric Daigle delves into the complex and evolving role of artificial intelligence in...
This week, Eric discusses the guiding principles and trends of traffic stops through reviewing the cases United States v. Rodriguez, United States v. Goodwill,...
